QSAR or Read-Across in Cosmetic Safety? Wrong question!
- 18 hours ago
- 1 min read

๐Both QSARs and Read-Across are widely accepted tools in animal-free safety assessment.ย
โYet in cosmetic safety discussions, this question keeps coming up:ย
๐ฆ๐ต๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฟ๐๐๐ ๐ค๐ฆ๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ-๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐?
The problem is they are not designed to replace one another. They address different scientific questions and help manage different types of uncertainty.
๐ค๐ฆ๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ต๐ฒ๐น๐ฝ๐ณ๐๐น ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ฒ ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ผ:
โ Quickly screen ingredients
โ Work with well-studied endpoints
โ Evaluate substances within model limits
โ Obtain fast, consistent predictions
๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ-๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐ต๐ฒ๐น๐ฝ๐ณ๐๐น ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ฒ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ:
โ Suitable analogues with relevant data
โ A need for biological or mechanistic reasoning
โ Safety assessments with higher uncertainty
โ A stronger justification for decisions
In practice, robust cosmetic safety assessments rarely rely on just one approach.ย
๐ QSARs help identify potential concerns.ย
๐ Read-Across helps strengthen confidence in conclusions.
๐ก๐ค๐ฆ๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ-๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ปโ๐ ๐ฎ๐น๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐. ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ๐โ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ผ๐น๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ณ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐พ๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐.
Contributed by Faizan Sahigara, in silico (QSAR) expert and Business Developer at CEHTRA

Comments